Update from CCCA Meeting

We had a great turnout of members at last night’s CCCA meeting, which together with the 60+ petition signatures demonstrated beyond a doubt that this is a neighborhood who’s residents really care and are active about shaping its future. Hopefully, this neighborhood attention to 605 P will continue, in order to make sure builders do not continue to steal water or electricity from neighbors or disturb neighbors on Sundays and after 7pm Monday-Saturday and that no shady activity occurs. If you catch any such activity, please call the Mayor’s hotline at 311 or DCRA at (202) 442-STOP (7867) right away.

The petition together with this website has caught the attention of DCRA and after months of repeated calls and visits to their “Illegal Construction,” Licensing, and Zoning offices from neighbors as well as followup from the mayor’s office, finally gotten the agency to respond to these complaints. Unfortunately, the response was not positive. Council Member Jim Evans read a letter from DCRA Director, Linda Argo, indicating that the agency has reviewed and decided that construction of a boarding house at 605 P ST NW is completely in compliance with existing permits. A DCRA representative, Don Masoero, attended the meeting to address questions noted the following in response to our concerns (a few points remain to be addressed, as noted below):

  • The owners of this property are allowed to build a single family home that clearly looks like boarding house, then once built, seek a certificate of occupancy to turn it into a boarding house.
  • They define “razing” differently than we have. Rather than calling it “razing,” there is a type of “demolition” which categorizes the work done at 605 P and includes knocking down exterior walls.
  • The fact that building plans show that there would be 70 feet of disturbed earth though builders checked the box on the building permit application form indicating that <50 feet would be disturbed, and furthermore that they disturbed an additional 80 feet of earth beyond the scope of their plans to build a rear staircase (total ~150 sqft disturbed), is up to DCRA’s discretion to enforce, and this is something they are choosing not to be concerned about. Mr. Masoero indicates that this matters only for environmental review and that he checked with the DCRA environmental office yesterday and they did not express any concerns.
  • The $36K construction costs listed on the application form are in fact a misrepresentation and when the building is completed, the owner will be taxed on the full amount of their construction spending, which, as the DCRA inspector pointed out, will help DCRA make up its budget shortfall.

For the record, the following points remain to be addressed:

  • In a May 4th email, DCRA Zoning Administrator Matt LeGrant wrote that “If the intended use [of an R-4 property construction project] is a rooming house all building permit and C of O application submittals should list this as the proposed use (not as a single family house).” It appears that DCRA is choosing to ignore its own policies here.
  • If what is going on at the property is not razing, then why did multiple DCRA review engineers (Thomas Guglielmo, Silroy Brown) note that a zoning permit would be required in earlier versions of the plans? The amount of walls that were to be razed in the plans do not appear to have decreased since that time AND the building plans themselves use the word “razing” to describe the knocking down of walls that has occured.
  • The District’s laws about whether a boarding house is a matter of right are still vague and conflicting: Although Title 11 states that boarding & rooming houses are a matter of right in an R-4 zoning, Title 10-A315.10 makes it sounds like this is amended so that special exceptions are required for rooming houses in R-4 zoned districts. The statement in that title is as follows and can be found here: http://www.dcregs.dc.gov/Notice/Download.aspx?VersionID=1290990

Amend the zoning regulations to require a special exception for dormitories, rooming houses, boarding houses, fraternities, sororities, and similar uses in the R-4 zoning district. 315.10”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Update from CCCA Meeting

  1. Pingback: Fix Contradictory Boarding House Laws/Oversight in DC | Neighbors Confront 605 P ST NW!

  2. ice cube says:

    really? come on! this used to be a CRACK HOUSE. give this guy a chance to turn a vacant property (which you surely have complained about with the rest of the shaw crazies to dcra for years im sure) into something nice and new. you cant have it both ways, yo! crack house or new building? your choice, but for gods sake, its a free country. stop holding back our hood!

    • Ayeh Bandeh-Ahmadi says:

      Ice Cube, I love Shaw and I don’t want nor expect it to be Georgetown, Dupont or Logan. In general, I absolutely share your sentiment, but when a project’s contractors and real estate agent tell you it’s going to be a poorly-managed disaster, that you should be concerned and that it will be bad for the neighborhood, wouldn’t you be worried?

  3. Franklin says:

    There’s no conflict in the law. The zoning regulations in Title 11 of the DC Municipal Rules control. There’s really nothing contradictory there if you understand how zoning works. If a boarding house is allowed in the residential district, then that ends the discussion for purposes of zoning. There’s no need for neighbor permissions, ANC approval, or anything else, so long as the building is built to code.

    And it’s not DCRA that’s used incorrect terminology; it’s you. “Razing” means an entire structure (whether a house, garage, shed, etc) is torn down. Demolition means portions of a structure are eliminated.

Leave a comment